Psi Chi meets in the Cougarden every Wednesday at 10:45a!

Thursday, November 20

Education and Income by Erika Smith



In America, education is free for all. It is mandatory that all children go to school until the age of about 16 years old. Despite that education is free and available for students, is it safe to say that all students of different income level receive the same education? Although most education is necessary, is every student receiving the same outcome of what they are learning? The answer to that is no. There are numerous children based on where they live and how much money their parents’ make who are deprived from better education. This will dissect the effects of income inequality for children in school as well as expand how it is relevant for their present and future.
First, children usually go to the school that is within their area. If they choose to not attend that school, they probably have to pay money to get into a private one (which will later be discussed) Children who live in low income neighborhoods will most likely attend the school within their area.  According to the US Department of Health Services, youth who live in low income neighborhood are more likely to engage in poor behaviors such as gang related, indulge in violence, steal, or become a runaway (Human Service, 2009). Nearly one third of the youth will not receive high school diplomas with about a quarter going on to a 4 year college. Living in a low income neighborhood, children are more likely to follow into these categories. Schools within these neighborhoods suffer losses within the student body. Some adults of the surrounding neighborhood have little to no hope in any of these adolescents succeeding. They have little support from their community and most times their own family.
Despite the higher possibilities of violence or dropouts, it doesn’t conclude that each teenager will end up falling to that category. There are plenty of students who want to succeed and outlive the “statistic” of what society believes they will become. Since their parents’ income is almost around the poverty line, they have no control as what school they will attend. The adolescents that want to better themselves ultimately lose out on the opportunity. How so? As a future teacher myself, and experience from seeing other teachers, one can easily be distracted by the “bad” students. Having to constantly become a baby sitter takes away from classroom management and attention on teaching. The students who are there to learn are not able to get the most of their school day because the teacher is not able to teach the way they should be. Another way students are not gaining the full experience is the lack of feeling safe. When there is high gang rates, high school are more cautions on weapons and fights. Students may be afraid to go to school which makes for missing homework and possibly lower grades. All of these factors tie into how having low income can lead to lack of a better education.
Next, students that come from lower income families have less access to resources. The biggest component in today’s society is technology. Technology has become a necessity in the classroom. It is impossible to write a paper without having access to the internet. A lot of children who live in low income neighborhoods do not have a computer at home. They may have to stay after school to use the computer which can be unaccommodating. According to American Psychological Association, students with lower income also cannot afford books, or tutors that promote a helpful learning environment (American Psychology Association, 2003). A lot of the parents that have low income jobs are working late hours into the night. They are never home and are not there to help their children with any questions on homework given to them. In comparison to children with a more stable income, their parents may be home by five to six o’clock, which gives enough time for questions in the evening. They also more likely have computers, books, and other resources that can help with homework. If children are very fortunate and their family can afford it, they may be able to sign them up for tutoring programs or have their own personal tutor. This greatly shows the vast difference on how income inequality leads to education inequality.
Not only do low income neighborhoods suffer from lack or resources at home, most of the time the school itself is in poor condition. The actual building may be falling apart, there won’t be enough text books or none at all, and unfortunately bad teachers. Going into a school that can be compared to a prison can discouraging. Students will lack school spirit, and it will feed into them believing they are not good enough. Since the school performance is probably lower academically, they are not getting enough money from the state that gives them the proper resources to learn; that too enables low self-esteem within the students. Teachers also play a major role in how the students learn. 27% of teachers actually major in the subject they are teaching in low income schools in comparison to 43% in a higher income school. This depicts the quality of education that each student is receiving (American Psychological Association, 2003). Having a good teacher is a necessity, especially in environments where the students need to be motivated socially, emotionally and academically.
As a future teacher myself, I am aware that each of my students will come from different backgrounds in race, culture and financial stability. Since there are statistics that show lower income may lead to a lesser education experience, I intend on accommodating my students to the best of my ability. Ways in which I will do is lending textbooks out, allowing time after school for help, and offering use of the internet during lunch hours or after school. This will enable my students to feel they have some access to what other students have usual access to. When I do become a teacher, a key component is to be there as an adult guide for my students. Depending on the area I decide to go into, there will be various needs that I will need to adjust to. It will be a challenge yet I am excited to motivate my students that feel like they have no one encouraging them.
In conclusion, it is vital to understand how much income inequality afflicts students across the country. There is a higher need of accommodating children who do not believe they are good enough and feel that they cannot achieve much in life. If teachers and people in their community take the time to offer the students the best they have, there is constant room for improvement. There is a common need in every student across America and a common understand that each child should receive the best education as possible. It is the goal of future educators for the sake of future American to prepare the students. Comprehending the facts is vital and if everyone becomes aware, there is hope for each students and low income will no longer play a role.
















References
American Psychological Association. (2003). Fact sheet: Facts about low income students and education. Washington, DC: American Psychological
ASPE Fact sheet. (2009). Fact sheet: Youth from low income families. Washington, DC: ASPE

4 comments:

  1. This post takes a good stand on the problem with low income schools and how it greatly affects the students and children in that area. Most students attend the school in which they live closest and in this case if a student lives in a low socioeconomic area then their school is also probably sub-par. As the post states this isn’t always bad but most of the time these schools are lacking in the resources that are necessary for students to succeed. One of those resources is the teachers and unfortunately there is such a thing as a bad teacher. If we are able to produce good teachers who care about the students and their future then as the post states, just maybe there won’t be problems with low-income schools. - Noah Auger

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hector A. Godinez (Response part 1)

    I was intrigued by this blog post because I have a strong connection to the topic of income inequality in the education system. During my grammar school years in Chicago, I was placed in the nearest school to home and it was not located in the best neighborhood. The neighborhood was predominantly hispanic and there was an incredible amount of gang activity taking place. Since 1st grade, I remember seeing the impact that gangs were making on the lives of my classmates, where they would pick fights with other students or wear gang attire because their older siblings were wearing them. These children were not receiving the proper support at home from their families, so they took the liberty to join a gang to replace their uninvolved family at home. My family was working/middle class and despite their busy lives, they knew that my education was of importance and they never stopped pushing my brother and I to succeed in school.
    When reading about the “statistic” in which some students try to outlive, because of their surroundings with gangs and violence, I felt that it is irrelevant and discriminatory. One should not care about the supposed statistic of low income individuals being successful in school, but they should focus more on the importance to do well in school because it will get them out of the rut of being poor with a future career or diploma. Their surroundings are significant and could cause a skew in the way that they make decisions but I feel that it all comes down to the support of a well disciplined family. From experience, I have cousins who are very smart individuals, with middle class parents but they never received a push or some sort of encouragement to be successful and get ahead in their lives. As a child and adolescent, your brain is still developing and your are learning new things and something you might find fascinating like violence or gangs are bad but if you don’t have that person who has lived through that experience to tell you that you shouldn’t get involved in violence or gangs, you will most likely fall into the trap.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hector A. Godinez (2nd half of response)

    Lack of resources and schools that are outdated have a major impact on a child’s learning and holds them back when they further their education from grammar school, to high school and even off to college. As an example, I transferred from my public school James Shields Elementary to a private school in Berwyn, Illinois called, St. Leonard. At St. Leonard, I was overwhelmed with the education I was receiving and it was embarrassing and humiliating to have typing class with students that had 1 year of experience on me, while I had never touched a keyboard in my life. The difference in education and resources from low income areas to middle and high income areas is drastic and students do not always have the power to move to better schools. If the students in low income families and neighborhoods have to attend a school lacking in education and resources, then they would have to make the best of it and succeed in that school. Low income students are highly esteemed especially when they do well in school because colleges look for hard working students that were deprived throughout their lifetime due to income. Colleges love to accept students that are well off academically through the roughness of living in a low income area, it makes the school trust the student more than a student from a middle/upper class area that has been given everything they wanted since day 1.
    Income inequality and low income areas are major indicators as to how great of an education you are going to receive at a school. Students need to block any statistic or supposed fact of low income students dropping out of school because of their surrounding environment. If low income students are struggling to focus on their studies because of the lack of support from their family and a violent environment, their schools need to provide programs in which the students could be engaged and motivated to do better and seek for a brighter future. Growing up in a low income environment is the biggest motivator to become successful in school and those that are less fortunate should know that they are not unnoticed because of their socioeconomic status because they could make a name for themselves through success in school.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've read a few of these blog posts and I really do like how people have connected it to their current or future careers. I also find it interesting that even though several of them have the same topic yet, they all add information to the next. For example in Christian Wilke's blog, he advised that the reasons for children missing school fall into three categories. One category being barriers which is the lack of access to healthcare. safe passages, or transportation. The second being aversion which is struggling academically, bullying, or anxiety. The third being discretion which is parents and students do not understand how much attendance matters. I think it is easy to miss class here and there and think that you really haven't missed that much. Just twice a month adds up to missing 10% of the school year. The other article also mentioned that some schools do not monitor absences. I think that all depends on the school. When I went to school they called home if you missed or if you arrived late. They made these phone calls daily. I do understand that not all of the schools have the resources to do this. I do think that there are a lot of office people who do have time but do not care. I wasn't aware until reading your article that 1/3 of students do not graduate high school. I like how you pointed out that sometimes it is the teachers fault. It is not always the students fault. It truly does take a community to raise a child. Some teachers do not care about teaching. I think some see it as an easy paycheck especially with the younger children. Also when schools are falling apart children do not feel comfortable in the environment and get easily distracted. I really enjoyed how your blog was one of the only blogs that mentioned how students succeed. It's good to point out the good in situations, I think it gives hope and shows that there are somethings that are right. People are always so focused on the negative. How do they expect children or anyone for that matter to do better when all they are talking about is the bad they have done? It is time to point on what good they have done and build their confidence so they will try and correct their wrongs. Schools need encouragement. Maybe then more students will do better.

    ReplyDelete