Money is
managed different ways by each family. Adolescents in a high-income family have
more access and better opportunity to more education and outside sources to
learn and gain knowledge. Adolescents in low-income family do not have as many
outside sources to learn more and gain knowledge. Money is used in a variety of
ways and in lower-income families- education is not usually the number one
priority. According to Duncan and
Murnane from Education Week, over 16 million U.S. children, more than 20%, were
livings in poor families in 2012. Those children of low-income families test
scores lagged behind those of higher income families by four-fifths of a
standard deviation. At such a young age,
adolescents depend on their parents for their educational needs, health need,
and etc. Those adolescents who are growing-up with families of higher-income
will be more ready to enter into kindergarten and have knowledge that is ahead
of others. I think that adolescents should be able to go into kindergarten at
the same level of all in kindergarten, regardless of the family income status. I
understand there are families who cannot afford education because of the family
income status, but I also understand there are families that can afford
education but chose to spend their money on other things. I think
There are
programs that help low income families afford schooling and pay back the school
at later dates, such as loans and financial aid. These loads and aid will allow these
adolescents who cannot afford schooling to attend a school and pay back the school
little by little. If you cannot afford to pay back the loads because of
low-income families, you can join a non-profit organization or service to the
government. According to Low Income assistant program, volunteering loan
forgiveness, medical loan forgiveness, occupational, or education loan
forgiveness can occur if one provides service to the government and society. This is a way adolescents could attend
schooling without having to worry about the income status of their parents.
Since education is such a large role in adolescents lives today. Sometimes low
income families result because of parents losing their jobs and their parents
are not able to get another job to help pay of education. Most of the money
low-income parents receive go to rent and food for the family. According to
Nancy Folbre from the New York Times in March 2014, states that more money is
being spent on child enrichment expenditures than ever before. But low-income
families just cannot keep up anymore. A direct line from the New York Times “…parents who aren’t very good at earning income are also not
very good at helping their children learn.” Low-income adolescents have the
right to learn just as much as higher-income adolescents. It is not the adolescents’
fault the adults in their life cannot provide for them enough to get a good
education. Professors Duncan and Murnane have studies and found that providing
poor families with significant income supplement showed positive effects on
academic achievement. This means there is a way for adolescents from low-income
families to be successful in education. Public education is more accessible to
those of low-income, but sometimes the public school is not safe or up to date
with technology, educational needs, and/or teacher certification. In 2004, the
Boston Public Schools began a concerted effort to expand and enhance
preschool education for 4-year-olds, applying additional resources,
improved curriculums and new forms of accountability for teachers and schools
(Folbre, 2014).
Money does not just affect
low-income adolescents on getting an education; interaction with adolescent and
parents is another factor. Higher income parents have more time to interact
with literacy activities with their children. Between birth and age six,
children from high-income families spend an average of 1,300 more hours in
novel contexts than children from low-income families (Duncan and Murnane,
2014). It has been proven from studies
that adolescents from low income had lower attendance in school and less academic
achievement than those low-income families who were given money to help them
supply schooling for their adolescent. The United States Earned Income Tax
Credit became a positive result in achievement for low-income families. “The strongest research evidence appears to indicate that
money matters in a variety of ways for children’s long-term success in school.”
(Duncan and Murnane, 2014). I see this as a powerful statement about those who
do not always have access to money like most people in today’s society and
school systems. I am a firm believer on everyone deserves some type of
education regardless of their income status. Not everyone can be high in
income, not everyone can maintain a job and have the ability to provide for their
family on unnecessary things that are wants not needs. There is also a book
called Restoring Opportunity by Greg J. Duncan and Richard J. Murnane.
This book provides a view of the educational growing gap between the haves and
not haves in America. This book shares the best way to improve education for
adolescents from low-income families. I read a short summary of this book; I
think it allows those who believe low-income families should not get the
opportunity to have the education of a normal income adolescent change their
minds.
“This thorough examination of
our public school system provides a clear picture of some of the toughest
challenges—particularly those facing low-income students—and the directions in
which we need to go to fix them. This book should be on the desk of every
educator and policy maker in America so we can begin to change the odds for all
of America’s children.” These are words from Geoffrey Canada, president and CEO, Harlem Children’s Zone. This right hear shows there are people out
there who care just as much about education for all adolescents as much as
others but have took a farther step and done something about it. Just because
low-income families cannot support education all the time doesn’t mean that
those should not get an education. Education is such a larger role in one’s
life today and missing education can affect ones ability to get a job and make
the right decisions. In conclusion, low-income adolescents should not have to
miss out on schooling because their parents cannot afford it. Just like Duncan
and Murnane talked about, education is very important and there are supplements
that can done and loans can be barrowed in order for adolescents to attend
school.
Works Cited
Duncan, Greg J., and
Richard J. Murnane. "Growing Income Inequality Threatens American
Education." Education Week. Phi
Delta Kappan, 28 Mar. 2014. Web. 17 Nov. 2014.
Duncan, Greg J., and
Richard J. Murnane. Restoring
Opportunity: The Crisis of Inequality and the Challenge for American Education.
New York: Harvard Education:The Russell Sage Foundation, 2024. Print.
"Find Ways to
Get Help with Paying Your Student Loans and Debt." Find Help with Paying Student Loans. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2014.
Folbre, Nancy.
"Helping Low-Income Children Succeed." Economix Helping LowIncome Children Succeed Comments. New York
Times, 24 Mar. 2014. Web. 17 Nov. 2014.
I agree with the points made in this blog. I feel that money does affect education and the families that are not able to make enough money to put there children through school at any grade level. Yes there are programs and different government policy that help students get funds through finical aid. The problem is that students that need the money will not always receive the finical aid that is necessary. Yes they can get some money that will be put towards college or school in general but that does not happen for every student. First they have to qualify for finical aid, than they need to actually have the resources to go and look for those kinds of finical aid. This means that they have to have a computer or Internet, because most of the time the applications for finical aid are online.
ReplyDeleteFinical aid can be such a positive when it comes to paying for college. But when paying for college finical aid is not the easiest thing to get. Even students that are from the lower middle class can find it hard to get any finical aid. When students and families that come from low-income backgrounds hear this information, they doubt they will get the money, and they will give up. That is why it can be a good and bad resource. The money is not always spread out evenly to the students that deserve and also qualify for the finical aid.
I do agree that those from high-income families to tend to be better off. As far as education I think that depending on your income you can go to a better school based on where you live but those from low income families can live in the same communities that have just as much opportunity to go to the same school. There are instances, if public school, where families from low income families can waive tuition fees so their kids can go to a good school. Same thing goes from preschool as long as it is not a private preschool.
ReplyDeleteThere is also more being done about low-income families and children who are of college age to continue education. Like the writer mentioned there is financial aid available to families with low income and often times Universities want to give everyone the same opportunity for an education that they are willing to try and award students interested in going to school a large financial package within reason. By this becoming more and more prominent it is giving kids the opportunity to go to school and get a higher education.
I agree with this writer that everyone deserves a fair and equal opportunity when it comes to education but that is not always the case. I don’t know that it will ever be. Those who have more money will always be unequal and as it seems will always think that they are better than the rest and will hold money over people’s heads. Money cannot buy you happiness they say. And I agree it can’t to a certain extent. But with people who have high incomes will always rank over those who have lower income because they have a lot more resources allocate