Income
Inequality in Schools
In this post I am not talking about family income and the
disparity between them but schools income and affordability themselves. If a
school does not have much money, they cannot afford the latest, new tools to
help their students grow and become strong citizens. Schools that have money
can buy the latest equipment and therefore equip their students with the best
possible chance of succeeding in school and in life. Now of course this all
matters to how the school uses the equipment, how well the teacher’s can
basically teach, and how well the students respond to the teacher and new
equipment. However, at a basic level, we can see that the poorer schools will
be fighting an uphill battle and the richer schools will at least be on level
terrain if not higher ground.
Schools that can afford SMART boards have a greater
ability in teaching because it can be used for multiple purposes. Schools that
still have blackboards may not be able to keep up with the other schools
because they cannot do as much. When it comes to teaching, being diverse is
good because each student in the classroom is diversely different and will
learn in different ways. If a poorer school is unable to teach in different
ways because of its limited ability in equipment and supplies then their
students may not be learning to their potential. This isn’t going to be one
magic fix by getting every school the same equipment. There are multiple
factors that go into that, however if schools are at least on the same level in
what they can and can’t afford then their students will also be on the same
level. If the students are all on the same level then it will be easier for the
school system as whole to cooperate and find ways to reach their student’s
potential rather than blaming it on insufficient funds and crappy technology or
supplies.
Private schools tend to have the better hand when it
comes to education because they usually have more money to use on their school
and students, due to having tuition. Public schools however must be funded and
when funds run low they cannot and do not have the ability to give their
student’s the best chance possible. This happens in primary school or k-12
schools but also happens in college as well. Universities and Private schools
have a higher advantage and Junior colleges when it comes to education because
they can afford the new stuff and the quality professors. In the system today
though, Junior college is a basic level college that get students the minimum
requirements for a specific job, like a trade schools. There is nothing wrong
with trade schools either, they are very efficient and usually really good at
what they do. However, the problem occurs when more and more students cannot
afford universities and then must go to a Junior College to receive a sub-par
education in their dream field of work. Private schools and Universities can
afford more things because their tuition is much higher than Junior Colleges.
However, more and more of their students are climbing into debt because they
need to take out loans just to afford college, just so they can get an adequate
education for their field work and hope to earn enough money to pay back their
debt and have a future life.
If it was at all possible, one of the best things the
U.S. could do for their education standards is equal out all the schools under
their control, which is basically all public schools. They could provide equal
funds to each school so students at every school have equal opportunities in
their education instead of being limited to what their school could afford.
Also this will allow the Education branch to have a better look at their system
instead of having multiple variables come into play and blur the main problems.
If schools were funded more equally than technically, when they “compete” with
each other they are at least on the same level playing field versus one school
always being ruled out due to their fund availability. In this sense the public
education system would be more equal overall and the private education system
would most likely remain the same since the government doesn’t have as much
control over them. When it comes to college, it would help if students could
afford to go to a quality university for an education instead of being forced
to attend a lesser quality school and possibly the chance of a lesser education
all because they could not afford the university. Right now there is a huge
disparity between “rich” schools and “poor” schools and if nothing changes the
harder it will be to head in the right direction in education.
No comments:
Post a Comment