Psi Chi meets in the Cougarden every Wednesday at 10:45a!

Thursday, November 20

School Closing and Income by Milagros Banos



                The direction in which education starts a man will determine his future in life” (Plato). Within the last several years there have been huge changes in the city of Chicago, Illinois. One major change would be the closing of many neighborhood public schools. The closing of these neighborhood public schools has had a huge psychological impact on the city. I will start with some information on a few of the schools and their neighborhoods. I will then go into some of the school boards reasons for closing the schools. I will then go into how far some of the children have to travel and what they encounter on the way to school. I will then go into how the parents and community feel about this. Lastly I will go into how the children feel about this and what the school board is doing to compensate for the school closings.
            According to the Chicago Tribune Newspaper, in May of 2013 Mayor Rahm Emmanuel released a list of 53 schools that were to be closing. The schools that were closed were mainly in low income neighborhoods. Alexander Von Humboldt Elementary School, Anthony Overton Elementary School, Benjamin Banneker Elementary School, Louis Armstrong Math and Science Elementary School and several others that are closing are located in poverty stricken neighborhoods. A few schools on the list weren’t closed. However, many of the schools that weren’t closed were relocated and merged together with other schools, often rival neighborhood schools.
            The Chicago Board of Education gave several reasons for their decision to close so may schools. They stated that the schools were performing lower than average and that they had been performing this way for many, many years. What exactly was they school board using to compare the schools to? They fail to take into consideration that some students have special needs, so they may not be able to perform test wise like “average” children can. Also some students are just bad test takers. Other students are hungry and have issues at home so they do not always do well on exams either. Why not see if the school has been improving within itself? Why continue to compare schools in poverty stricken neighborhoods to schools in upper-class neighborhoods that have many resources that the other schools do not.  Their main reason was that there was a one billion dollar deficit and they needed to cut costs. Smart choice they made there, cutting education knowing that the children that attend these elementary schools can’t really fight back. So they will close these schools, which has already happened, and now they will save money on the buildings utilities and upkeep. Yet, they will not be investing in the children that they’ve kicked out of those schools. Question is, is do they even care?
            These children now have no neighborhood schools. They have to travel miles to attend the nearest “neighborhood” school. Some children do not even get a choice. They get a letter letting them know which school they will be attending the following school year. How is this fair? These children are risking getting sick due to traveling further distances to school in bad weather. Many people know that Chicago has some very brutal winters and the wind chills are often unbearable. Children risk their lives just going to school. They have to pass different neighborhoods and risk either getting hurt directly by gang member or getting hurt because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Also, many of the buildings are now abandoned. What happens to abandoned buildings? Well, may homeless people take over them and so do gang members. Drugs are made, dealt, and kept hidden in abandoned buildings. Also, people are killed and raped in abandoned buildings as well as other crimes that are committed in them. This does not seem to concern the Board of Education. Again, I ask the question do they really care?
            The closing of these schools has affected the parents greatly. Many parents now have to sign up their children for new schools. They also do not have a choice in finding a better school for their child and have to go with their new neighborhood school due to the deadlines have passed for schools open enrollment. Some parents are very involved in their children’s schools and now feel like they have been pushed out. Many have protested and had rallies to not have the schools closed. Yet, their voices seem to have gone either unheard or uncared for. The schools still closed. Many parents attended and spoke up at an open Chicago Board of Education meeting against the schools closings. One parent named Erica Clark, who is also a part of Parents 4 Teachers, told board members “As a parent, as a mother, every Chicago public school is my school”. After she said that people cheered and she was escorted out by security. Another parent named Shannon Bennet who was there with the Kenwood Oakland community organization spoke his concerns as well and as he did this, they shut off they microphone so he spoke loudly and of course received cheers from the crowd. He was also escorted out of the meeting by security. Do you see a pattern here? It seems like when the Board of Education feels threatened by something that someone has to say they will have their microphones shut off and have security escort them out. Did they think that that would really shut up all of these upset parent? They are sadly mistaken if they thought so.
            Many community members were very upset about all of the school closings as well. Several aldermen have spoken out against the school closings as well as organized rallies and protests. Alderman Bob Fioretti of the second district even had a suggestion for the school board. He told them to redirect tax increment financing, give money back to the district instead of closing schools in order to solve their deficit. Did I mention that the students didn’t acquire this debt? The Chicago Teachers Board Union President, Karen Lewis made a statement as well to the Chicago Board of Education saying “I personally feel you are on the wrong side of history, and history will judge you”. What she is saying is that they are not making a positive change for the community. They are making negative changes that will not help the children and after all aren’t the children our future? Karen Lewis also stated “Let’s not carry over any of the ugliness. Let’s move forward”. She said this regarding when the board said that several schools had performed poorly for several years. She was asking for a fresh start for these students, some of which were new students. The school stated that one school has been on probation for over seventeen years. I do not know anyone that is in elementary school for seventeen years, so why continue to talk about that? Why not focus and how to make to school better and see how the school has improved? I’ll tell you why, because it is a whole lot easier to point out the negative than it is to actually take the time to see what good has come out.
            The closing of the schools has had a bigger effect on adolescents than on anyone else. There are many children that have special needs and require special classes that not all schools provide. Lyman Trumbull middle school, located at 5200 N. Addison in Chicago, has about 400 students and 35% of them have special needs. They now expect these children who require extra attention to start all over at another school. These students will be losing their friends, the teachers that they have come to trust and the school that they have become so familiar with. Closing schools with high amounts of special needs children is also a problem for other schools. Due to there will now be a bigger number of them in one school and the teachers will not be able to give them the attention that they need. This would also bring down the academic scores for the entire school which can then place it on the closing list.
The closings has also effected many of the other students. They will now have to travel miles when they once traveled blocks to get an education. They will lose their friends, teachers, and schools. They will also be losing the neighborhood they hung around in before and after school. Many of these children will have to pass through different gang terfs and have to deal with the daily violence as they travel. Many kids are beat up and robbed for what little they do have. Some are even shot and killed on their way to and from school. These children no longer see school as a safe zone due to they have to travel through unsafe places just to get there. Many students miss days and drop out altogether. Other students join the street life and become the people that they once feared preying off other children trying to make their way to and from school. Why do children have to go through this every day? Many parents work so they cannot drop off their children and pick them up. The children cannot take the school bus due to there aren’t many and the once that are available don’t travel near them to pick them up. Who pays for the public transportation that these children have to take at least twice a day? Some parents do and other cannot afford it so they have to leave extra early to travel. This means losing valuable sleep time which will cause stress and also cause the child’s grade to decline.
Now, let us talk about what the school board feels that they are doing to help and to “compensate” for all of the school closures. The school board feels that by sending the children to other schools not far that they are not really causing any harm at all. They have also started safe passage zones where police stand guard near the schools to make sure nothing bad happens. Now, I will admit that the safe passage idea was a good one. However, it only lasted about a week before you would no longer see police out in the streets. So much for that idea! The board also started promoting charter schools, which have been popping up like weeds everywhere.
            Many people do not know that the charter schools are “innovative public schools”. Think about that for a few minutes. They said that they do not fund charter schools. I call bullshit! They do in fact give charter schools funding, not as much as they gave public schools though. Considering they had no money and needed to close the schools, how do they have money to give to all of these new charter schools? Just like district schools charter schools or innovative public schools are funded by the district and state. Wait a minute there’s no money for that! Many children that have attended public schools that have also attended charter schools say that there are in fact differences. Many do not like that charter schools are so strict and the parents have to pay if the child acts out. Also, many charter schools are quick to kick out their students instead of trying to help them. One thing that really surprised me was hearing from a student who graduated from a public elementary school and graduated from a charter high school tell me that charter schools “dumb it down” for certain students. This interested me, so of course I asked him to explain. He said that when a student doesn’t understand the material they are not graded as hard as the other children are and aren’t held at the same level that other children are in the school. This was strange to me because one of the reasons that they gave for closing so many of the schools was that they were underperforming. So charter schools, maybe not all, aren’t following the same rules as the public schools that were closed but are getting their funding. This is just crazy!
            So my conclusion has been that this is obviously a political move and the people that run the Board of Education are hypocrites. They want to solve the schools problem of low test scores so they close them. That makes sense. Then, they say that they are closing them due to the deficit yet, they are giving money to these new charter schools. That makes sense as well. The Board of Education has completely lost sight of what is important and that is the children. They have taken away many of these children’s safety blankets that are their schools. Many have done so with ought even a second thought. These are the people that we are supposed to trust to make the right choices for our children yet they do not even care. It is sad that the people who do care are escorted away by security. What will happen to our children? What will happen to our future? Whitney Houston says it well “I believe the children are our future. Teach them well and let them lead the way”.


A few sources I used are listed below:
Ahmed-Ullah, N. (2013, Apr 26). At chicago school closing hearings, crowds fade. McClatchy - Tribune Business News Retrieved from https://ccc.idm.oclc.org/docview/1346051877?accountid=37965
Allweiss, A., & Grant, C. A. (2013). PROGRESSIVES, CONSERVATIVES AND "EDUCATIONAL DISADVANTAGE": THE LIMITS OF THE BIFURCATION. Race, Gender & Class, 20(1), 8-24. Retrieved from https://ccc.idm.oclc.org/docview/1464752237?accountid=37965
Guarino, M. (2013, May 29). Chicago simmers over school closings. is that bad for mayor emanuel? The Christian Science Monitor Retrieved from https://ccc.idm.oclc.org/docview/1356147029?accountid=37965
"Just the FAQs-Charter Schools." The Center for Education Reform. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2014.
https://www.edreform.com/2012/03/just-the-faqs-charter-schools/

No comments:

Post a Comment