Psi Chi meets in the Cougarden every Wednesday at 10:45a!

Thursday, November 20

Socioeconomics and Its Impact on Adolescent Mental Disorders in a School Setting by Daniel Briguglio





















Socioeconomics and Its Impact on Adolescent
Mental Disorders in A School Setting
Daniela Briguglio
Concordia University Chicago











Abstract
This paper explores two articles that conducted research about the difference socioeconomics (SES) makes on adolescent development. One of the researches took place at middle schools where 7th graders were interrogated about their family incomes and their feelings. As a result it was indicated that socioeconomics makes adolescence a difficult time where depression and low self-esteem starts to develop. It was also said that depression has been growing in adolescence in the past few years so the need for a study such as this was more than needed. Depression along with low self-esteem has increased because of its effects of socioeconomics and the effect that it has had on a child’s parent. Parents play a crucial part in this study and it shows that they also contribute to the development of depression during adolescence.  The second study was also conducted with young adolescents. Both financially stable and those of lower economic status were tested. Again, like the previous study, it showed that lower economic standings suffered with mental disorders. The second study had a different twist to it. Most of those with disorders were mostly White adolescents. This was concluded to one reason, being that those who had higher educated parents were being pushed too hard and were given too high of expectations causing stress and anxiety. Two different studies, one final conclusion; mental disorder definitely is caused by socioeconomics.
            Keywords: Depression, Low Self-Esteem, Anxiety, Adolescence, Mental Disorders




Socioeconomics and Its Impact on Adolescent
Mental Disorders in A School Setting
            In today’s society, it is becoming clearer who is of lower class and who is in a higher social class. Jobs are becoming harder to obtain and parents are struggling to keep their families alive. As everyone focuses on the impact socioeconomics has on the parents of a household, no one tries to think of what socioeconomics can do to the adolescents who are experiencing the same struggles. According to an article by M. Kemal Sayar, “Depressive disorders in childhood and adolescence are characterized by core persistent and pervasive sadness, boredom or irritability that is functionally impairing, and relatively unresponsive to usual experiences that might usually bring relief…” (208). This means that activities that would normally bring children joy and happiness create no such reactions. Since depression is a mood disorder, activities that are supposed to be fun are no longer a source of pleasure.
Some may argue that what a child or adolescent goes through does not compare to the problems parents deal with. Although the children are not struggling to provide for the family, they take in everything that goes on and that is where the depression begins to generate. Depression is something that can happen to all age groups, but for a child to develop that at such a young age is a real concern. This will eventually spread to other complications such as anxiety, low self-esteem and sudden outbursts. What can really be dangerous is if the child has other psychiatric disorders before depression. They will be at higher risks of adding the depressive disorder to their list.
            The first article was a research conducted at two different schools (private and state schools). 7th graders were the targets; therefore 50 girls and 56 boys were asked questions about their economic status and their feelings. They were given three questionnaires first and then followed with a personal information sheet. After gathering all the research it was clear that those of lower income had depression and low self-esteem along with anxiety. Although predictable, the reasons why caused people to pay attention. Depression was scored higher at state schools (low economics) verses private schools (higher economics). A factor in this research that contributes to the depressive disorder is the amount of school the child’s parents have received. Those who have had more education are able to provide more for their kids, not only financially, but academically as well. These students are able to get more time with a teacher or tutor if need be and their parents are able to help them at home as well. Those whose parents are not of higher education are not being helped as much. What exactly is considered high education and low education? The education level was split up between college graduate (or an advanced degree), some college, high school, some high school or less than high school. Obviously, if the parent received a high school, college or an advanced degree they are capable of providing more. Those who only attended some of high school or below it cannot give their children the assistance while studying.
These students feel that they are alone in the process and cannot achieve what they expected to achieve in school. This is where depression and self-esteem issues start to grow.  According to Sayar, “Self-esteem refers to how a person perceives and evaluates him or herself within the context of experiences and the environment “ (209). Adolescents who have self-esteem issues think that they are not good at whatever they do, leading them to feeling helpless and insecure. Self-esteem also leads to depression. The root to all of this is income. The wealthy do not suffer as much, but low-income families deal with depressive disorder. The thought that all of this derives from money is insane. It is not only ridiculous, but also very depressing in itself. Depression is not something that can be gone within a day or two and to have it at a young age is not the ideal lifestyle. It is something that is caused by the environment. The way the adolescent views the world and how they react to the experiences puts them at risk.
What gives a family an advantage or disadvantage regardless of education is the actual socioeconomic status of the family. In the second research by Katie A. McLaughlin, the objective was to see how SES and Adolescent Mental Disorders go hand in hand. McLaughlin describes that the diagnostic assessment was given to adolescents who “were administered a modified version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview” (1743). The diagnoses were grouped into four classes “mood disorders (major depression disorder or dysthymia and bipolar I-II disorder), anxiety disorders (panic disorder with or without agoraphobia…), disruptive behavior disorders (attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder…) and substance disorders (alcohol and drug abuse…)” (1743). They too examined the educational background of parents and where they lived. The end result was similar to Sayar’s. They were able to find that the parents’ educational background definitely helps or hurts the situation and that those who are of higher socioeconomic standing usually do not suffer from depression or other mental disorders.
Something interesting about this second study was that they did not only test according to socioeconomic status. They added ethnicity to it as well and what came out of it would most likely shock many people. For some reason there seems to be a reputation for African Americans and Hispanics, stating that they would be of lower economic standing and based on this study they would be the ones who suffer from mental disorders. What the study showed was the complete opposite. Although some of them may be struggling financially and considered low class like many others, the ones who showed to be the most impacted were the White adolescents. In the article McLaughlin states, “Many, but not all studies of child and adolescent mental health have noted a stronger association between poverty and mental disorders among non-Hispanic White youths than among youths of other racial/ethnic backgrounds” (1748). This outcome includes the fact that only half of many African American children have parents with a college degree. What McLaughlin says to be the reason of all of this is the idea of life expectance.  This means that racial/ethnic groups differ based upon what they expect out of their lives. Those who have high expectations are the ones who tend to have anxiety and depression, while those who have low expectations do not. In this study the ones who did not think much of their futures (African Americans/Hispanics) did not suffer from mental disorders, and if they did it was not at a high risk. The Non-Hispanic White adolescents had high expectations and therefore suffered from depression and anxiety.
This research continued in saying that those whose parents have a higher educational degree are sometimes the problem. They tend to have high expectations for their children and therefore cause stress. This stress then translates to anxiety, which can spiral into many other mental disorders. Although they can provide more for their children it can sometimes be the problem. Adolescents who can afford to go to a better school might be forced to do multiple after school activities. Getting piano lessons or playing multiple sports can cause a child to feel overwhelmed and like this research states, the child has high expectations because that is the mentality they have been brought up with. They do what they can to please their parents even if it means that they are not pleased themselves. What I believe this research says about Hispanic and African American families is not that they do not have enough faith and want from their children, but that they are more practical with what they expect out of them.
If the two researches were combined the final statement would be that yes there is a definite connection between socioeconomics and mental disorders. What makes the disorders different in each case is how the individuals tested were treated and what they had to go through on a daily basis. Everyone is different and capable of doing what he or she wishes, but sometimes there are rode blocks (in this case social standings). These adolescents are either pushed too hard to succeed, do not get enough help or believe that they are not able to do anything right. The thought that depression, anxiety and other mental disorders can even begin to develop at a young age such as adolescence is mind blowing. No child should feel that they have failed at that age because they have their entire life to live. Within that life, they have time to change what they do not like and make it better. Those who suffer should be able to receive help within their schools. It should not be something they need to pay for because it would be provided for them. The whole problem is money so to charge them to get help would not make any sense.
Whether the adolescent struggles financially or not they are all vulnerable to mental disorders. Those who are of a high social class are sometimes pushed too far where they are able to develop a mental disorder. Then there are those who are not provided with enough help because of their economic standing, and they too are able to develop a mental disorder. In conclusion, these children need guidance and the right to live a childhood with no worries. No child should feel like they are not good enough and have to deal with anxiety and depression. What seems like a non-threatening disorder now can become a major problem later on in life. Schools should try to prevent as much of that as possible. Socioeconomics should not be a factor in this problem. Children should not worry about how much money they have, but rather how they should grow properly so that they can improve their lives in the future. I believe that society puts a great amount of pressure on everyone and the “high expectations” start from there and then slowly slide into the lives of these children. We should strive to stop the ridiculous behavior going on now and focus on what truly matters, the lives of these children who will be the future of this country.
             













References
Mclaughlin, K. A., Costello, E. J., Leblanc, W., Sampson, N. A., & Kessler, R. C.
(2012). Socioeconomic Status and Adolescent Mental Disorders. American Journal Of Public Health, 102(9), 1742-1750. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300477
Sancakoğlu, S., & Sayar, M. K. (2012). Relation Between Socioeconomic Status
and Depression, Anxiety, and Self-esteem in Early Adolescents. Yeni Symposium, 50(4), 207-220.



















No comments:

Post a Comment